The DC formulation [20] is based on the same parameters, but with the following three additional simplifying assumptions.
| (3.18) |
| (3.19) |
| (3.20) |
Substituting the first set of assumptions regarding branch parameters from (3.18), the branch admittance matrix in (3.2) approximates to
| (3.21) |
Combining this and the second assumption with (3.1) yields the following approximation
for :
The approximate real power flow is then derived as follows, first applying (3.19) and (3.22), then extracting the real part and applying (3.20).
As expected, given the lossless assumption, a similar derivation for the power injection
at the to end of the line leads to leads to .
The relationship between the real power flows and voltage angles for an individual
branch can then be summarized as
| (3.24) |
where
and is defined in terms of the series reactance
and tap ratio
for branch
as
For a shunt element at bus , the amount of complex power consumed is
So the vector of real power consumed by shunt elements at all buses can be approximated by
| (3.26) |
With a DC model, the linear network equations relate real power to bus voltage angles,
versus complex currents to complex bus voltages in the AC case. Let the vector
be constructed similar to
, where the
-th element is
and let
be
the
vector whose
-th element is equal to
. Then the nodal real power
injections can be expressed as a linear function of
, the
vector of bus voltage
angles
| (3.27) |
where
| (3.28) |
Similarly, the branch flows at the from ends of each branch are linear functions of the bus voltage angles
| (3.29) |
and, due to the lossless assumption, the flows at the to ends are given by . The
construction of the system
matrices is analogous to the system
matrices for the
AC model:
The DC nodal power balance equations for the system can be expressed in matrix form as
| (3.32) |