The DC power flow model can also be used to compute the sensitivities of branch flows to
changes in nodal real power injections, sometimes called injection shift factors (ISF) or
generation shift factors [20]. These sensitivity matrices, also called power
transfer distribution factors or PTDFs, carry an implicit assumption about the
slack distribution. If is used to denote a PTDF matrix, then the element in
row and column , , represents the change in the real power flow in
branch given a unit increase in the power injected at bus ,
| (4.34) |
This slack distribution can be expressed as an vector of non-negative weights whose elements sum to 1. Each element specifies the proportion of the slack taken up at each bus. For the special case of a single slack bus , is equal to the vector . The corresponding PTDF matrix can be constructed by first creating the matrix
| (4.35) |
then inserting a column of zeros at column . Here and are obtained from and , respectively, by eliminating their reference bus columns and, in the case of , removing row corresponding to the slack bus.
The PTDF matrix , corresponding to a general slack distribution , can be obtained from any other PTDF, such as , by subtracting from each column, equivalent to the following simple matrix multiplication:
| (4.36) |
These same linear shift factors may also be used to compute sensitivities of branch flows to branch outages, known as line outage distribution factors or LODFs [21]. Given a PTDF matrix , the corresponding LODF matrix can be constructed as follows, where is the element in row and column , representing the change in flow in branch (as a fraction of the initial flow in branch ) for an outage of branch .
First, let represent the matrix of sensitivities of branch flows to branch endpoint injections, found by multplying the PTDF matrix by the node-branch incidence matrix:
| (4.37) |
Here the individual elements represent the sensitivity of flow in branch with respect to injections at branch endpoints, corresponding to a simulated increase in flow in branch . Then can be expressed as
| (4.38) |